Shibdon on 7th August 2008
From the angles this cannot be identified as Syrphus ribesii as originally thought and there's a risk
anyway because there is the possibility of Syrphus rectus.
George Simpson
|
Clara Vale on 23rd August 2008
From the angles this cannot be identified as Syrphus ribesii as originally thought and there's a risk
anyway because there is the possibility of Syrphus rectus.
Gordon Pollinger |
